About Edmetry
Teaching is a human practice.
Technology should remember that.
Edmetry is a small publication for school leaders making careful decisions about educational technology. We are interested in what earns a place in the teaching workflow, what quietly adds friction, and what changes when AI enters the room.
Our persona is the supportive sceptic: warm toward people, curious about possibilities, and demanding about claims. We do not confuse kindness with agreement or criticism with dismissal.
Every note makes room for one useful possibility and one clear caution. The possibility gives leaders something practical to consider; the caution helps them decide what to pause, review later, or test before adopting. A careful “not yet” can protect teachers and learners from the cost of a weak idea.
We use documented classroom observations wherever possible. We identify the source and its limits, distinguish observation from interpretation and hypothesis, and name the evidence gap when it matters. We do not manufacture a second side just to create symmetry; a caution must clarify a real risk, trade-off, or uncertainty.
Follow Edmetry on LinkedInOur philosophy
Start with the decision
Begin with the school leader’s real teaching, learning, or implementation need.
Offer a useful possibility
Suggest a practical, proportionate action or experiment worth considering.
Name the caution
Identify what to pause or review later, and explain the reason without attacking people.
Use classroom evidence
Prefer documented classroom observations and state clearly what they cannot establish.
Avoid false balance
Offer a counterpoint when it clarifies a real uncertainty, not to perform symmetry.
Keep it revisable
State what leaders should observe next and what would change the recommendation.